In Chapter
11 on Attention (Pg. 56) James talks about the different types of attention
that people possess, depending on their field of consciousness. Some can be “highly
focalized and concentrated” on a task or thought, while others may find their attention
being distracted often, pulling in various directions. James goes on to say
that “others sink into a subject of meditation deeply, and when interrupted,
are ‘lost’ for a moment before they come back to the outer world” (pg. 57),
which is a connection I found between James and a study presented in the
article The Myths of Multitasking.
Rosen states that in “one study by researchers at the University of California
at Irvine monitored interruptions among office workers; they found that workers
took an average of twenty-five minutes to recover from interruptions such as
phone calls or answering e-mail and return to their original task” (Pg. 2).It
seems to be that the distraction is more than a mere moment, but several
minutes before some people can find their way back to a primary task.
One area
within the world of communication that I am a big advocate for is active
listening, being in the moment. It’s a difficult skill to work at and often
people find themselves distracted by other things outside of the present
conversation. Rosen mentions research that reflects a negative light on using
phones and accessing the Internet as often as we do, so we don’t miss out on
anything. This is one example of a main distraction that people allow themselves
to get wrapped up in or too focused on. I would say my main battle in the
classroom is the telephone. Going a whole hour without texting someone, checking
Facebook or email is viewed as a travesty. This article, and James, reinforce
that the distractions from one train of thought to another can be a hindrance
to being an active listener.
This excerpt
from a book does a good job of conveying my connection and intention. “Mindful
listening is one of the highest compliments we can pay to others because it
conveys the relationship-level meaning that they matter to us. Being mindful
requires discipline and commitment. We have to discipline our tendencies to
judge others, to dominate the talk stage, and to let our minds wander” (Wood,
2012).
On page 5
Rosen spends a section discussing James’ perspective on attention and how a
hundred years later it’s more familiar than foreign. I wonder if mastering
reign over one’s own attention is a skill, a habit, or both? Maybe it’s a skill
to master, but a habit to maintain?
Reference:
James, W. (2001). Talks to
teachers on psychology and to students on some of life's ideals. Mineola,
NY: Dover. (Original work published 1899).
Woods,
Julia T. (2012) “Interpersonal
Communication: Everyday Encounters.” 7th Ed. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage
Learning.
So where does said mindfulness and discipline come from? Is it a habit? Can it become a habit? I think this is where voluntary attention is helpful (initially, though perhaps not over the long term). How can we cultivate it in learners? How can you get your students to WANT to turn off their phones? Hmmm.
ReplyDeleteI just finished reading, well rather scrutinizing, James chapter on will and I think I have an answer to your last question. How do I get students to WANT to turn off their phones? I need to tap into their passive attention by presenting the material in ways that are exciting, interesting, and relevant to them, so as to inhibit by substitution. What we are discussing is so awesome that they completely forget about their phones! Well that is no easy feat but I think I'm up for the challenge. I also mention this is 6.3.
Delete